The table
Best desktop card: NVIDIA RTX 5090, 136.1 MH/s (measured, 2026-10-06). Best stock MH per wall watt: NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti, 0.577 at 135.9 W, untuned (measured by the fleet, 2026-10-08). Best tuned: NVIDIA RTX 5090, 0.563 at 226.8 W (measured, 2026-10-06).
The rented model sweep of 8 October 2026 (23 rows, 22 models, every row untuned) found class v4's rate cap-proof: a card on a host power cap gives the same MH/s as an uncapped one. Class v5 held class v4's rate on every uncapped card and read 17 to 18 percent under it on the two power-capped hosts (an A4000 at 114 W, a GTX 1080 Ti at 130 W), so a class v5 rate needs the card's power state beside it; the table's rates are class v4.
One row per card on the current class: the class v4 program (the latency-shadow block over the class v3 hash), or a class v3 row re-measured with its class v4 cost on 6 October 2026 or later. MH per wall watt uses board or wall power; a row whose watts are the chip's (Apple silicon: GPU plus DRAM from IOReport) says so and is not ranked on that column. Integrated GPUs are not listed.
Cards you can buy
| NVIDIA RTX 5090 (32 GB)class v4 133.8 MH/s, 305 W, 0.439 · 2026-10-06 | 136.1 stock (127.7 tuned) | 0.563 | 226.8 tuned (350 stock) W | Tuned | |
| Hive flight sheet core lock 1,854 MHz, mem 13,801 MHz, PL 460 W (measured 6 October 2026 (Ember run 6: the clock lock 1,854 MHz, the memory clock as read, the limit 460 W of 575 as the cap did not bind))Class v4 cost class v4 at the 1,200 MHz knee: 133.80 MH/s at 305.1 W (0.439 MH/W); the premium over class v3 81.8 W at the best points and 145.3 W unlocked, measured 7 October 2026Tuned full Ember Tune: 1,854 MHz core lock at the 100 percent capGenerator v2 · Miner Igneum Miner 0.3.13 + Ember Tune kit 6 (mining, class v3 program) (NVIDIA driver, Windows 11)Source bench log: 6 October 2026, Ember run 6; Counter ASIC 3.0 status: item 8's 5090 rows and the class v4 efficiency pass (7 October 2026) · Who measured by the teamNote one row for the card: best rate 136.1 MH/s at 350 W stock unlocked on the class v3 control (bench, 6 October 2026); best MH per wall watt 127.71 MH/s at 226.8 W at the full Ember Tune point, 1,854 MHz (Ember run 6, 6 October 2026); the class v4 efficiency pass (7 October 2026, 60 s steps, every fingerprint matched): unlocked 136.84 MH/s at 475.5 W (0.288), the 1,400 MHz lock 134.98 at 316.3 W (0.427), the knee 1,300 MHz, the best point 1,200 MHz 133.80 at 305.1 W (0.439); the fleet's standing 5090 reads 100.6 MH/s at 308 W beside its prover (reported by the fleet) | |||||
| NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti (16 GB)class v4 not measured · 2026-10-08 | 78.5 | 0.577 | 135.9 W | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (rented card, no clock control on the host; no measured tune point)Class v4 cost not measured (class v4 program only)Tuned stock, bench only (rented, no clock control on the host)Generator v2 · Miner bench pack, igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (3 x 300 dispatches of 2^22) (NVIDIA driver 595.84, Ubuntu 24.04 (CUDA 12.8.1 image))Source model sweep 2026-10-08, row 1 (a rented card, result cb2-rtx-5070-ti-16-gb-7324-result.json; 09:23Z) · Who measured by the fleetNote rented single-card host, 0.06 h; power.draw mean 135.9 W (instant 139.0, max 140.0, limit 300 W), SM 2,795 MHz mean, memory 13,801 MHz, 47 C, no throttle reason; self-test PASS (96 of 96 vector lanes); the class v5 kit holds the same rate on this card (78.72 MH/s, fingerprint matched); read ceiling 79.6 MH/s, so the hash runs at 0.99 of it | |||||
| NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti (16 GB)class v4 not measured · 2026-10-07 | 78.4 | 0.539 | 145.6 W | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read)Class v4 cost not measured (class v4 program only)Tuned stock, bench only (rented, not tuned)Generator v2 · Miner hive package 0.3.20 igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (NVIDIA driver 580, Ubuntu 24.04)Source bench log: 7 October 2026, every rentable card on the hash (the fleet's sweep on rented cards; hive package 0.3.20, Ubuntu 24.04) · Who measured by the fleet | |||||
| NVIDIA RTX 5080 (16 GB)class v4 +83 W unlocked, +41 W at the best points · 2026-10-08 | 71.4 stock (71.2 tuned) | 0.486 | 146.6 tuned (253 stock) W | Tuned | |
| Hive flight sheet core lock 1,100 MHz, mem 0 MHz, PL 0 W (core lock 1,100 MHz, memory stock, power limit untouched (measured 8 October 2026, the efficiency pass))Class v4 cost 83.4 W unlocked and 41 W at the best points for 0.2 percent of rate (class v4 71.41 MH/s at 253.1 W against class v3 71.28 at 169.7 W unlocked; measured 8 October 2026)Tuned core lock 1,100 MHz (the efficiency pass's best point: 71.20 MH/s at 146.6 W, 0.486 MH/W, 106.5 W recovered for 0.29 percent of rate), memory 14,801 MHz, the driver's power limit untouchedGenerator v2 · Miner the runner's card switch, class v4 program (job run-ca3-pc1-v4-eff-5080-20261007-d) (NVIDIA driver 617.14, Windows 11)Source bench log: 7 to 8 October 2026, the class v4 efficiency passes: the core clock lock on the RTX 5090 and the RTX 5080 · Who measured by the teamNote the knee sits between 1,000 and 900 MHz (the rate within 0.3 percent of unlocked down to 1,000 MHz, 5.2 percent off at 900 on class v4); the draw floors from 1,500 MHz down. The rented fleet's 5080 read 71.16 MH/s at 143.4 W stock (hive package 0.3.20, Ubuntu 24.04, 7 October 2026), 110 W under this card's stock draw: the method differs per row (nvidia-smi on Linux, the runner's card switch on Windows) and neither is taken as the card's figure until the fleet re-measures | |||||
| NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti (24 GB)class v4 not measured · 2026-10-07 | 62 | 0.248 | 249.5 W | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read)Class v4 cost not measured (class v4 program only)Tuned stock, bench only (rented, not tuned)Generator v2 · Miner hive package 0.3.20 igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (NVIDIA driver 580.65.06, Ubuntu 24.04)Source bench log: 7 October 2026, every rentable card on the hash (the fleet's sweep on rented cards; hive package 0.3.20, Ubuntu 24.04) · Who measured by the fleet | |||||
| NVIDIA RTX 3080 Ti (12 GB)class v4 not measured · 2026-10-07 | 59 | 0.221 | 267.3 W | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read)Class v4 cost not measured (class v4 program only)Tuned stock, bench only (rented, not tuned)Generator v2 · Miner hive package 0.3.20 igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (NVIDIA driver 580.65.06, Ubuntu 24.04)Source bench log: 7 October 2026, every rentable card on the hash (the fleet's sweep on rented cards; hive package 0.3.20, Ubuntu 24.04) · Who measured by the fleetNote 283.0 W maximum | |||||
| NVIDIA RTX 3080 Ti (12 GB)class v4 not measured · 2026-10-08 | 58.9 | 0.201 | 293.5 W | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (rented card, no clock control on the host; no measured tune point)Class v4 cost not measured (class v4 program only)Tuned stock, bench only (rented, no clock control on the host)Generator v2 · Miner bench pack, igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (3 x 300 dispatches of 2^22) (NVIDIA driver 580.65.06, Ubuntu 24.04 (CUDA 12.8.1 image))Source model sweep 2026-10-08, row 3 (a rented card, result cb2-rtx-3080-ti-12-gb-efll-result.json; 09:28Z) · Who measured by the fleetNote rented single-card host, 0.04 h; power.draw mean 293.5 W (max 299.6, limit 320 W), SM 1,936 MHz mean, memory 9,251 MHz, 74 C, the SW power-cap bit set 26 W under the limit; self-test PASS (96 of 96 vector lanes); the class v5 kit runs 2.5 percent faster on this card (60.38 MH/s, fingerprint matched); read ceiling 58.9 MH/s, the hash at 1.00 of it. Matches the 7 October row (58.95 MH/s) across hosts; the worst MH per watt of the sweep and the cheapest MH per rented hour, so a buyer on a power bill prefers the 5070 Ti and a renter this card | |||||
| NVIDIA RTX 4090 (24 GB)class v4 not measured · 2026-10-07 | 52.3 | 0.285 | 183.1 W | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read)Class v4 cost not measured (class v4 program only)Tuned stock, bench only (rented, not tuned)Generator v2 · Miner hive package 0.3.20 igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (NVIDIA driver 580, Ubuntu 24.04)Source bench log: 7 October 2026, the RTX 4090 hands row · Who measured by the fleetNote the hands row: the card mines and proves (17.4 GB peak while proving); the standing 4090 voters read 44.5 to 50.8 MH/s this hour beside their provers | |||||
| NVIDIA RTX 5070 (12 GB)class v4 not measured · 2026-10-07 | 52 | 0.506 | 102.8 W | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read)Class v4 cost not measured (class v4 program only)Tuned stock, bench only (rented, not tuned)Generator v2 · Miner hive package 0.3.20 igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (NVIDIA driver 580, Ubuntu 24.04)Source bench log: 7 October 2026, every rentable card on the hash (the fleet's sweep on rented cards; hive package 0.3.20, Ubuntu 24.04) · Who measured by the fleet | |||||
| NVIDIA RTX 5070 (12 GB)class v4 not measured · 2026-10-08 | 51.8 | 0.468 | 110.8 W | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (rented card, no clock control on the host; no measured tune point)Class v4 cost not measured (class v4 program only)Tuned stock, bench only (rented, no clock control on the host)Generator v2 · Miner bench pack, igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (3 x 300 dispatches of 2^22) (NVIDIA driver 580.173.02, Ubuntu 24.04 (CUDA 12.8.1 image))Source model sweep 2026-10-08, row 8 (a rented card, result cb2-rtx-5070-12-gb-8750-result.json; 09:35Z) · Who measured by the fleetNote rented single-card host, 0.09 h; power.draw mean 110.8 W (max 112.0, limit 250 W), SM 2,851 MHz mean, memory 13,801 MHz, 60 C, no throttle reason; self-test PASS (96 of 96 vector lanes); the class v5 kit holds the rate (51.98 MH/s, fingerprint matched); read ceiling 52.3 MH/s, the hash at 0.99 of it. Repeats the 7 October row (52.01 then, 51.82 now) at 8 W more on this host; second to the 5070 Ti in MH per watt among consumer cards (GDDR7 lifts Blackwell here, not SM count); 12 GB holds the class v4 set with 10 GB spare | |||||
| NVIDIA RTX 3090 (24 GB)class v4 not measured · 2026-10-07 | 50 | not measured | not read | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read)Class v4 cost not measured (class v4 program only)Tuned stock, miningGenerator v2 · Miner hive package 0.3.20 igneum-miner, class v4 program (NVIDIA driver, Ubuntu 24.04)Source the fleet's standing voters (status lines, 7 October 2026) · Who reported by the fleetNote the best of four standing voters this hour (42.2 to 50.0 MH/s) beside their provers; watts not read | |||||
| NVIDIA RTX 3080 (10 GB)class v4 not measured · 2026-10-07 | 43.7 | not measured | not read | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read)Class v4 cost not measured (class v4 program only)Tuned stock, miningGenerator v2 · Miner hive package 0.3.20 igneum-miner, class v4 program (NVIDIA driver, Ubuntu 24.04)Source the fleet's standing voter (status line, 7 October 2026) and the sweep's hands row · Who reported by the fleetNote a standing voter's status line, 18:00Z; the hands row of the sweep reads 40.82 MH/s at 204.9 W; 10 GB, no prover | |||||
| NVIDIA RTX 4080 Super (16 GB)class v4 not measured · 2026-10-08 | 42.6 | 0.316 | 134.9 W | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (rented card, no clock control on the host; no measured tune point)Class v4 cost not measured (class v4 program only)Tuned stock, bench only (rented, no clock control on the host)Generator v2 · Miner bench pack, igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (3 x 300 dispatches of 2^22) (NVIDIA driver 580.126.09, Ubuntu 24.04 (CUDA 12.8.1 image))Source model sweep 2026-10-08, row 23 (a rented card, result cb2-rtx-4080-super-16-g-2453-result.json; 10:03Z) · Who measured by the fleetNote rented single-card host, 0.12 h; power.draw mean 134.9 W (max 138.4, limit 320 W), SM 2,740 MHz mean, memory 11,254 MHz, 51 C, no throttle reason; self-test PASS (96 of 96 vector lanes); the class v5 kit holds the rate (42.68 MH/s, fingerprint matched); read ceiling 43.1 MH/s, the hash at 0.99 of it. The 23 Gbps GDDR6X gives it 4.6 percent over the 4080 for 6 W more at the same MH per watt: the Ada 256-bit tier is 41 to 43 MH/s whichever card | |||||
| NVIDIA RTX 4070 Ti Super (16 GB)class v4 not measured · 2026-10-08 | 41.2 | 0.289 | 142.6 W | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (rented card, no clock control on the host; no measured tune point)Class v4 cost not measured (class v4 program only)Tuned stock, bench only (rented, no clock control on the host)Generator v2 · Miner bench pack, igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (3 x 300 dispatches of 2^22) (NVIDIA driver 615.71.09, Ubuntu 24.04 (CUDA 12.8.1 image))Source model sweep 2026-10-08, row 2 (a rented card, result cb2-rtx-4070-ti-super-7325-result.json; 09:26Z) · Who measured by the fleetNote rented single-card host, 0.10 h; power.draw mean 142.6 W (max 145.2, limit 285 W), SM 2,885 MHz mean, memory 10,251 MHz, 47 C, the SW thermal bit set with no rate effect (three runs within 0.02 percent); self-test PASS (96 of 96 vector lanes); the class v5 kit holds the rate (41.37 MH/s, fingerprint matched); read ceiling 41.6 MH/s, the hash at 0.99 of it. The Ada 192-bit bus class: the same MH per watt as the 4070 Ti; the extra 4 GB buys headroom, not rate | |||||
| NVIDIA RTX 4080 (16 GB)class v4 not measured · 2026-10-08 | 40.7 | 0.317 | 128.6 W | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (rented card, no clock control on the host; no measured tune point)Class v4 cost not measured (class v4 program only)Tuned stock, bench only (rented, no clock control on the host)Generator v2 · Miner bench pack, igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (3 x 300 dispatches of 2^22) (NVIDIA driver 595.84, Ubuntu 24.04 (CUDA 12.8.1 image))Source model sweep 2026-10-08, row 4 (a rented card, result cb2-rtx-4080-16-gb-7347-result.json; 09:28Z) · Who measured by the fleetNote rented single-card host, 0.15 h; power.draw mean 128.6 W (max 130.5, limit 320 W), SM 2,776 MHz mean, memory 10,801 MHz, 38 C, no throttle reason; self-test PASS (96 of 96 vector lanes); the class v5 kit holds the rate (40.80 MH/s, fingerprint matched); read ceiling 41.0 MH/s, the hash at 0.99 of it. One percent under the 4070 Ti Super at 14 W less: the Ada 16 GB tier is a 41 MH/s tier whichever card | |||||
| NVIDIA RTX 3070 Ti (8 GB)class v4 not measured · 2026-10-07 | 39 | 0.219 | 178.3 W | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read)Class v4 cost not measured (class v4 program only)Tuned stock, bench only (rented, not tuned)Generator v2 · Miner hive package 0.3.20 igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (NVIDIA driver 595.71.05, Ubuntu 24.04)Source bench log: 7 October 2026, every rentable card on the hash (the fleet's sweep on rented cards; hive package 0.3.20, Ubuntu 24.04) · Who measured by the fleet | |||||
| NVIDIA RTX 3070 Ti (8 GB)class v4 not measured · 2026-10-08 | 39 | 0.22 | 177.1 W | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (rented card, no clock control on the host; no measured tune point)Class v4 cost not measured (class v4 program only)Tuned stock, bench only (rented, no clock control on the host)Generator v2 · Miner bench pack, igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (3 x 300 dispatches of 2^22) (NVIDIA driver 595.71.05, Ubuntu 24.04 (CUDA 12.8.1 image))Source model sweep 2026-10-08, row 6 (a rented card, result cb2-rtx-3070-ti-8-gb-8528-result.json; 09:33Z) · Who measured by the fleetNote rented single-card host, 0.07 h; power.draw mean 177.1 W (max 183.6, limit 290 W), SM 1,955 MHz mean, memory 9,251 MHz, 67 C, no throttle reason; self-test PASS (96 of 96 vector lanes); the class v5 kit holds the rate (39.12 MH/s, fingerprint matched); read ceiling 39.1 MH/s, the hash at 1.00 of it. Repeats the 7 October row on another host (38.98 then, 38.98 now; 178 then 177 W), so the class v4 number is host-independent to 0.1 percent | |||||
| NVIDIA RTX 3070 (8 GB)class v4 not measured · 2026-10-08 | 37.1 | 0.261 | 142.3 W | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (rented card, no clock control on the host; no measured tune point)Class v4 cost not measured (class v4 program only)Tuned stock, bench only (rented, no clock control on the host)Generator v2 · Miner bench pack, igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (3 x 300 dispatches of 2^22) (NVIDIA driver 580.65.06, Ubuntu 24.04 (CUDA 12.8.1 image))Source model sweep 2026-10-08, row 5 (a rented card, result cb2-rtx-3070-8-gb-qh9j-result.json; 09:32Z) · Who measured by the fleetNote rented single-card host, 0.06 h; power.draw mean 142.3 W (max 146.7, limit 225 W), SM 2,002 MHz mean, memory 6,801 MHz, 57 C, no throttle reason; self-test PASS (96 of 96 vector lanes); the class v5 kit holds the rate (37.14 MH/s, fingerprint matched); read ceiling 37.2 MH/s, the hash at 1.00 of it. Against the 3070 Ti: 5 percent less rate for 25 percent less power, the better owner card of the two; 8 GB holds the class v4 set with room | |||||
| NVIDIA RTX 3070 (8 GB)class v4 not measured · 2026-10-07 | 33.7 | not measured | not read | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read)Class v4 cost not measured (class v4 program only)Tuned stock, miningGenerator v2 · Miner hive package 0.3.20 igneum-miner, class v4 program (NVIDIA driver, Ubuntu 24.04)Source the fleet's 0.3.21 wipe canary (status line, 7 October 2026) · Who reported by the fleetNote the 0.3.21 wipe canary's status line, 17:07Z, beside its node; watts not read | |||||
| NVIDIA RTX 3060 Ti (8 GB)class v4 not measured · 2026-10-07 | 33.1 | 0.256 | 129.5 W | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read)Class v4 cost not measured (class v4 program only)Tuned stock, bench only (rented, not tuned)Generator v2 · Miner hive package 0.3.20 igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (NVIDIA driver 580, Ubuntu 24.04)Source bench log: 7 October 2026, every rentable card on the hash (the fleet's sweep on rented cards; hive package 0.3.20, Ubuntu 24.04) · Who measured by the fleet | |||||
| NVIDIA RTX 3060 Ti (8 GB)class v4 not measured · 2026-10-08 | 31.7 | 0.316 | 100.4 W | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (rented card, no clock control on the host; no measured tune point)Class v4 cost not measured (class v4 program only)Tuned stock, bench only (rented, no clock control on the host)Generator v2 · Miner bench pack, igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (3 x 300 dispatches of 2^22) (NVIDIA driver 595.91.07, Ubuntu 24.04 (CUDA 12.8.1 image))Source model sweep 2026-10-08, row 10 (a rented card, result cb2-rtx-3060-ti-8-gb-8771-result.json; 09:37Z) · Who measured by the fleetNote rented single-card host, 0.12 h; power.draw mean 100.4 W (max 104.7, limit 180 W), SM 1,560 MHz mean, memory 5,001 MHz on this host (below the 7,000 MHz GDDR6 stock), 61 C, no throttle reason; self-test PASS (96 of 96 vector lanes); the class v5 kit holds the rate (31.75 MH/s, fingerprint matched); read ceiling 31.8 MH/s, the hash at 1.00 of it. Four percent under the 7 October 3060 Ti row (33.1 on another host), consistent with this host's lower memory clock; the best MH per watt of the Ampere cards | |||||
| NVIDIA RTX 5060 (8 GB)class v4 not measured · 2026-10-07 | 31.3 | 0.415 | 75.4 W | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read)Class v4 cost not measured (class v4 program only)Tuned stock, bench only (rented, not tuned)Generator v2 · Miner hive package 0.3.20 igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (NVIDIA driver 580, Ubuntu 24.04)Source bench log: 7 October 2026, every rentable card on the hash (the fleet's sweep on rented cards; hive package 0.3.20, Ubuntu 24.04) · Who measured by the fleet | |||||
| NVIDIA RTX 4070 Ti (12 GB)class v4 not measured · 2026-10-07 | 31.3 | 0.291 | 107.3 W | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read)Class v4 cost not measured (class v4 program only)Tuned stock, bench only (rented, not tuned)Generator v2 · Miner hive package 0.3.20 igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (NVIDIA driver 580, Ubuntu 24.04)Source bench log: 7 October 2026, every rentable card on the hash (the fleet's sweep on rented cards; hive package 0.3.20, Ubuntu 24.04) · Who measured by the fleet | |||||
| NVIDIA RTX 4070 Super (12 GB)class v4 not measured · 2026-10-08 | 31.2 | 0.312 | 100.2 W | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (rented card, no clock control on the host; no measured tune point)Class v4 cost not measured (class v4 program only)Tuned stock, bench only (rented, no clock control on the host)Generator v2 · Miner bench pack, igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (3 x 300 dispatches of 2^22) (NVIDIA driver 580.178.04, Ubuntu 24.04 (CUDA 12.8.1 image))Source model sweep 2026-10-08, row 9 (a rented card, result cb2-rtx-4070-super-12--8582-result.json; 09:36Z) · Who measured by the fleetNote rented single-card host, 0.13 h; power.draw mean 100.2 W (max 103.9) under a 110 W host cap (stock 220 W), SM 2,764 MHz mean, memory 10,251 MHz, 53 C, no throttle reason; self-test PASS (96 of 96 vector lanes); the class v5 kit holds the rate (31.29 MH/s, fingerprint matched); read ceiling 34.4 MH/s, the hash at 0.91 of it. Lands on the 4070 Ti's number (31.26 on 7 October) at 7 W less (the same 192-bit 21 Gbps bus); the host's 110 W cap cost no rate, a tune-down reading in itself: an owner can cap a 4070 Super at half its stock power and lose nothing on class v4 | |||||
| NVIDIA RTX 4070 Ti (12 GB)class v4 not measured · 2026-10-08 | 31.2 | 0.327 | 95.4 W | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (rented card, no clock control on the host; no measured tune point)Class v4 cost not measured (class v4 program only)Tuned stock, bench only (rented, no clock control on the host)Generator v2 · Miner bench pack, igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (3 x 300 dispatches of 2^22) (NVIDIA driver 580.126.09, Ubuntu 24.04 (CUDA 12.8.1 image))Source model sweep 2026-10-08, row 20 (a rented card, result cb2-rtx-4070-ti-12-gb-0695-result.json; 09:57Z) · Who measured by the fleetNote rented single-card host, 0.18 h; power.draw mean 95.4 W (max 96.7, limit 285 W), SM 2,825 MHz mean, memory 10,251 MHz, 49 C, no throttle reason; self-test PASS (96 of 96 vector lanes); the class v5 kit holds the rate (31.28 MH/s, fingerprint matched); read ceiling 31.7 MH/s, the hash at 0.99 of it. Repeats the 7 October rate to 0.07 percent on another provider at 12 W less; the 192-bit Ada pair (4070 Ti, 4070 Super) land on one number, 31.2 MH/s under 100 W | |||||
| NVIDIA RTX 4070 (12 GB)class v4 +30 W · 2026-10-06 | 31 | 0.389 | 79.5 W | Tuned | |
| Hive flight sheet core lock 1,863 MHz, mem 10,251 MHz, PL 100 W (measured 6 October 2026 (Ember run 6: 1,863 MHz at the 50 percent cap of 200 W, 75.6 W drawn; the item 8 rows at 1,860 MHz and 160 W))Class v4 cost +30 W (79 to 109 W) for +0.4 percent of rate at 102,100 ops per hash, measured 6 October 2026Tuned full Ember Tune: 1,860 MHz core lock, 160 W cap (Ember run 6: 1,863 MHz at the 50 percent cap, 75.6 W)Generator v2 · Miner igneum-worker-cuda bench (installed worker), class v3 control (NVIDIA driver, Windows 11)Source Counter ASIC 3.0 status: item 8, the RTX 4070 rows (job run-ca3-pc1-4070-shadow-20261006) · Who measured by the teamNote 79.3 to 79.8 W at the tune point; 28.78 MH/s at 75.6 W (0.381) in Ember run 6 mining | |||||
| NVIDIA RTX 5060 Ti (16 GB)class v4 0.1 percent rate · 2026-10-07 | 30.9 | 0.269 | 114.8 W | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read)Class v4 cost 0.1 percent of rate, measured 7 October 2026Tuned stock, bench only (180 W default cap, never tuned)Generator v2 · Miner Igneum Miner 0.3.19 package, prebuilt NVRTC worker (bench mode, class v4 program) (NVIDIA driver, Windows 11)Source bench log: 7 October 2026, the first 16 GB card: an RTX 5060 Ti in a Thunderbolt enclosure (run b) · Who measured by the teamNote class v4 program, 128 loads per hash, 1 GiB dataset, 10-minute window on the card alone at the stock 180 W limit: 114.8 W mean; PCIe 4.0 x4 through the enclosure | |||||
| Apple M5 Max (40 GPU cores, Metal)class v4 +16 W · 2026-10-06 | 27 | ○ 1.29 | 21 W chip, not wall | No lever | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read)Class v4 cost +16 W for 1.5 percent of rate at 102,100 ops per hash, measured 6 October 2026Tuned no lever on Apple silicon (no clock or power control exposed); stockGenerator v2 · Miner igneum-miner Metal worker, class v3 program (macOS, Metal)Source Counter ASIC 3.0 status: item 8, the Apple M5 Max rows (IOReport GPU and DRAM watts) · Who measured by the teamNote GPU plus DRAM watts from IOReport, not wall power, so its MH per watt is not ranked against the cards' wall figures | |||||
| NVIDIA RTX 3060 (12 GB)class v4 not measured · 2026-10-07 | 26.9 | 0.241 | 111.6 W | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read)Class v4 cost not measured (class v4 program only)Tuned stock, bench only (rented, not tuned)Generator v2 · Miner hive package 0.3.20 igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (NVIDIA driver 580.126.09, Ubuntu 24.04)Source bench log: 7 October 2026, every rentable card on the hash (the fleet's sweep on rented cards; hive package 0.3.20, Ubuntu 24.04) · Who measured by the fleetNote 114.5 W maximum; the Devnet 3 boxes read 23.7 to 25.7 MH/s beside their nodes | |||||
| NVIDIA RTX 2080 Ti (11 GB)class v4 not measured · 2026-10-08 | 26 | 0.116 | 224.6 W | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (rented card, no clock control on the host; no measured tune point)Class v4 cost not measured (class v4 program only)Tuned stock, bench only (rented, no clock control on the host)Generator v2 · Miner bench pack, igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (3 x 300 dispatches of 2^22) (NVIDIA driver 580.159.03, Ubuntu 24.04 (CUDA 12.8.1 image))Source model sweep 2026-10-08, row 11 (a rented card, result cb2-rtx-2080-ti-9077-result.json; 09:40Z) · Who measured by the fleetNote rented single-card host, 0.13 h; power.draw mean 224.6 W (max 234.7, limit 300 W; the driver reports no power average on Turing), SM 1,914 MHz mean, memory 6,802 MHz, 72 C, no throttle reason; self-test PASS (96 of 96 vector lanes); the class v5 kit holds the rate (26.04 MH/s, fingerprint matched); read ceiling 29.9 MH/s, the hash at 0.87 of it. The first Turing row: the 7 October 2080 Ti pod that left no result was a host fault, not the card. The worst MH per watt measured on any card (the Titan RTX, the same silicon, read 28.3 MH/s at 226 W on 7 October): an owner mines at a loss on any real power price; 11 GB holds the set | |||||
| NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti (8 GB)class v4 not measured · 2026-10-07 | 20.1 | 0.259 | 77.5 W | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read)Class v4 cost not measured (class v4 program only)Tuned stock, bench only (rented, not tuned)Generator v2 · Miner hive package 0.3.20 igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (NVIDIA driver 580, Ubuntu 24.04)Source bench log: 7 October 2026, every rentable card on the hash (the fleet's sweep on rented cards; hive package 0.3.20, Ubuntu 24.04) · Who measured by the fleet | |||||
| NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti (16 GB)class v4 not measured · 2026-10-08 | 20.1 | 0.253 | 79.2 W | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (rented card, no clock control on the host; no measured tune point)Class v4 cost not measured (class v4 program only)Tuned stock, bench only (rented, no clock control on the host)Generator v2 · Miner bench pack, igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (3 x 300 dispatches of 2^22) (NVIDIA driver 595.71.05, Ubuntu 24.04 (CUDA 12.8.1 image))Source model sweep 2026-10-08, row 7 (a rented card, result cb2-rtx-4060-ti-16-gb-7364-result.json; 09:33Z) · Who measured by the fleetNote rented single-card host, 0.22 h; power.draw mean 79.2 W (max 86.2, limit 165 W), SM 2,836 MHz mean, memory 8,751 MHz, 63 C, no throttle reason; self-test PASS (96 of 96 vector lanes); the class v5 kit holds the rate (20.10 MH/s, fingerprint matched). Repeats the 7 October number (20.10 then, 20.07 now); the one card of the sweep well under its probed read ceiling (0.65 of 30.9 MH/s: the 128-bit bus with the large L2 makes the chase probe optimistic), so 20 MH/s at 79 W is the card's rate; 16 GB holds any class with room | |||||
| NVIDIA RTX 2070 Super (8 GB)class v4 not measured · 2026-10-08 | 19.1 | 0.115 | 166 W | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (rented card, no clock control on the host; no measured tune point)Class v4 cost not measured (class v4 program only)Tuned stock, bench only (rented, no clock control on the host)Generator v2 · Miner bench pack, igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (3 x 300 dispatches of 2^22) (NVIDIA driver 575.57.08, Ubuntu 24.04 (CUDA 12.8.1 image))Source model sweep 2026-10-08, row 12 (a rented card, result cb2-rtx-2070-super-8-g-9129-result.json; 09:41Z) · Who measured by the fleetNote rented single-card host, 0.15 h; power.draw mean 166.0 W (max 167.8, limit 215 W; no power average on Turing), SM 1,955 MHz mean, memory 6,802 MHz, 64 C, no throttle reason; self-test PASS (96 of 96 vector lanes); the class v5 kit holds the rate (19.12 MH/s, fingerprint matched); read ceiling 30.1 MH/s, the hash at 0.63 of it: Turing does not overlap the independent reads the hash needs (its indep probe 2.45 G loads/s binds). The Turing per-watt floor: a 4060's rate at twice the power | |||||
| NVIDIA RTX 4060 (8 GB)class v4 not measured · 2026-10-08 | 19.1 | not measured | not read | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (rented card, no clock control on the host; no measured tune point)Class v4 cost not measured (class v4 program only)Tuned stock, bench only (rented, no clock control on the host)Generator v2 · Miner bench pack, igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (3 x 300 dispatches of 2^22) (NVIDIA driver 595.91.07, Ubuntu 24.04 (CUDA 12.8.1 image))Source model sweep 2026-10-08, row 18 (a rented card, result cb2-rtx-4060-8-gb-0672-result.json; 09:53Z) · Who measured by the fleetNote watts not read: this host exposes no power sensor (every power field absent on all 244 samples, as the 7 October 4060 host); a third host is being rented for the watts, and the card's draw is about 60 to 70 W by its 115 W limit and the 4060 Ti's 79 W, an estimate until then. Rented single-card host, 0.12 h; SM 2,732 MHz mean, memory 8,251 MHz, 57 C, no throttle reason; self-test PASS (96 of 96 vector lanes); the class v5 kit holds the rate (19.11 MH/s, fingerprint matched); read ceiling 30.2 MH/s, the hash at 0.63 of it (the 128-bit bus: the independent-read line binds, as on the 2070 Super). Repeats the 7 October row (19.09 then, 19.10 now) | |||||
| AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT (16 GB)class v4 +2 percent rate · 2026-10-08 | 18.9 (18.8 to 19.2 on the G1 ladder) | 0.093 | 202 stock W | No lever | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (no lever on AMD in 0.3.20; no measured tune point)Class v4 cost +2 percent of rate (19.29 against 18.92 MH/s) at 102,100 ops per hash, watts owed, measured 6 October 2026Tuned no lever: the app has no AMD knob today (an AMD core-clock knob through rocm-smi or ADL is the path, a morning item)Generator v2 · Miner igneum-worker-opencl bench (installed worker), class v3 control (Adrenalin 26.9.2, Windows 11)Source Counter ASIC 3.0 status: the 9070 XT Ember tune (run-ca3-pc1-ember-9070-20261007, 06:11Z, app 0.3.20) for the watts; item 8's RX 9070 XT rows (the G1 ladder, 6 October 2026) for the rate · Who measured by the teamNote the watts are the app's own power reading at the stock point, no external sampler (8 October 2026, the status row): the Ember tune on this card measured the stock point and stopped, 0.3.20 having no AMD knob (power_pct 0, clock_cap 0, limit 0.0 W) | |||||
| NVIDIA GTX 1080 Ti (11 GB)class v4 not measured · 2026-10-08 | 16.3 | 0.131 | 124.3 W | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (rented card; Pascal has no clock lock; no measured tune point)Class v4 cost not measured (class v4 program only)Tuned stock, bench only (rented; Pascal has no clock lock on any host)Generator v2 · Miner bench pack, igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (3 x 300 dispatches of 2^22) (NVIDIA driver 580.173.02, Ubuntu 24.04 (CUDA 12.8.1 image))Source model sweep 2026-10-08, rows 17 and 22 (two rented hosts, results cb2-gtx-1080-ti-11-gb-0377-result.json and cb2-gtx-1080-ti-11-gb-1452-result.json; 09:49Z and 10:02Z) · Who measured by the fleetNote the mean of the first host's two clean runs (16.26 MH/s at 124.3 W, the card uncapped at a 280 W limit); a second host read 16.29 MH/s at 129.4 W under a 130 W host cap with five of five self-tests passing, so the first host's one-in-three cache self-test failure was that host's VRAM and not Pascal, and the flag is cleared. Power.draw on the first host max 125.5 W (no power average on Pascal), SM 1,936 MHz mean, memory 5,005 MHz, 59 C; the class v5 kit held the rate on the uncapped host (16.27 MH/s) and read 13.27 MH/s on the 130 W-capped one (fingerprint matched on both); read ceiling 16.3 MH/s, the hash at 1.00 of it. The first Pascal row: a 2017 card that runs the class at its own ceiling | |||||
| NVIDIA RTX 2060 (6 GB)class v4 not measured · 2026-10-08 | 14.1 | 0.117 | 120.6 W | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (rented card, no clock control on the host; no measured tune point)Class v4 cost not measured (class v4 program only)Tuned stock, bench only (rented, no clock control on the host)Generator v2 · Miner bench pack, igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (3 x 300 dispatches of 2^22) (NVIDIA driver 580.159.03, Ubuntu 24.04 (CUDA 12.8.1 image))Source model sweep 2026-10-08, row 19 (a rented card, result cb2-rtx-2060-0673-result.json; 09:55Z) · Who measured by the fleetNote rented single-card host, 0.15 h; power.draw mean 120.6 W (max 124.6, limit 160 W; no power average on Turing), SM 1,948 MHz mean, memory 6,801 MHz, 69 C, no throttle reason; self-test PASS (96 of 96 vector lanes); the class v5 kit holds the rate (14.14 MH/s, fingerprint matched); read ceiling 16.1 MH/s, the hash at 0.88 of it. The floor of the list and the smallest card on it: the class v4 set fits with 4.6 GB spare; the same Turing per-watt floor as the 2070 Super and the 2080 Ti, so every Turing card earns the same per watt and only the absolute rate differs | |||||
| Intel Arc B580 (12 GB)class v4 0.1 percent rate · 2026-10-07 | 11 | not measured | not read | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read)Class v4 cost 0.1 percent of rate, measured 7 October 2026Tuned stock, bench onlyGenerator v2 · Miner igneum-worker-opencl bench, class v4 program (Intel driver, Windows 11)Source bench log: 7 October 2026, the Intel Arc B580 (eGPU equals slot) · Who measured by the teamNote the same rate in the Thunderbolt enclosure and the slot; watts not read on this run. Re-read 8 October 2026: the installed 0.3.21 OpenCL worker on this card passes its own self-test with the devnet pack (96 of 96 vector lanes) and mined 54 CPU-re-checked blocks at 10.58 MH/s, so the row stands; a kit build from a branch without the Intel rotate-fold rewrite failed its self-test on this card the same morning, a build fault and not an Arc result | |||||
38 cards. Details opens a card's Hive flight-sheet values, its full class v4 cost, miner, source and note.
Datacentre (13 cards, rented for the measurement; about three times the rented dollars per hash of a desktop card)
| NVIDIA B200 (180 GB)class v4 not measured · 2026-10-07 | 416.4 | 0.487 | 855.6 W | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read)Class v4 cost not measured (class v4 program only)Tuned stock, bench only (rented, not tuned)Generator v2 · Miner hive package 0.3.20 igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (NVIDIA driver 580, Ubuntu 24.04)Source bench log: 7 October 2026, every rentable card on the hash (the fleet's sweep on rented cards; hive package 0.3.20, Ubuntu 24.04) · Who measured by the fleet | |||||
| NVIDIA H200 SXM (141 GB)class v4 not measured · 2026-10-07 | 313 | 0.723 | 432.9 W | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read)Class v4 cost not measured (class v4 program only)Tuned stock, bench only (rented, not tuned)Generator v2 · Miner hive package 0.3.20 igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (NVIDIA driver 580, Ubuntu 24.04)Source bench log: 7 October 2026, every rentable card on the hash (the fleet's sweep on rented cards; hive package 0.3.20, Ubuntu 24.04) · Who measured by the fleet | |||||
| NVIDIA H100 SXM (80 GB)class v4 not measured · 2026-10-07 | 248.7 | 0.645 | 385.6 W | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read)Class v4 cost not measuredTuned stock, bench only (rented, not tuned)Generator v2 · Miner igneum-worker-cuda bench (Linux), class v3 control (NVIDIA driver 580.126.09, Ubuntu 24.04)Source bench log: 7 October 2026, every rentable card on the hash (the fleet's sweep, a rented card) · Who measured by the fleetNote 424.0 W maximum; 98 percent of its random-read ceiling like the 5090; 1.78x the 5090's hash at 1.15x the tuned 5090's hash per watt and a third of the hash per rented dollar | |||||
| NVIDIA H100 SXM (80 GB HBM3)class v4 not measured · 2026-10-08 | 248.3 | 0.605 | 411.7 W | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (rented card, no clock control on the host; no measured tune point)Class v4 cost not measured (class v4 program only)Tuned stock, bench only (rented, no clock control on the host)Generator v2 · Miner bench pack, igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (3 x 300 dispatches of 2^22) (NVIDIA driver 580.126.09, Ubuntu 24.04 (CUDA 12.8.1 image))Source model sweep 2026-10-08, row 14 (a rented card, result cb2-h100-80-gb-rs3d-result.json; 09:43Z) · Who measured by the fleetNote rented single-card host, 0.03 h; power.draw mean 411.7 W (instant 434.1, the largest gap between the two fields in the sweep, 22 W; max 437.1, limit 700 W), SM 1,980 MHz, HBM3 2,619 MHz, 36 C, no throttle reason; self-test PASS (96 of 96 vector lanes); the class v5 kit reads 252.64 MH/s, 1.5 percent over class v4 (fingerprint matched); read ceiling 252.4 MH/s, the hash at 0.99 of it. Repeats the 7 October rows (248.70, 248.21) on a third host; the best per-watt figure of the sweep on power.draw (0.573 on the instant field) and the worst MH per rented dollar: an owner's card on cheap power, never a renter's | |||||
| NVIDIA A100 PCIe (80 GB)class v4 not measured · 2026-10-07 | 155 | 0.517 | 299.6 W | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read)Class v4 cost not measured (class v4 program only)Tuned stock, bench only (rented, not tuned)Generator v2 · Miner hive package 0.3.20 igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (NVIDIA driver 580, Ubuntu 24.04)Source bench log: 7 October 2026, every rentable card on the hash (the fleet's sweep on rented cards; hive package 0.3.20, Ubuntu 24.04) · Who measured by the fleet | |||||
| NVIDIA A100 SXM (80 GB)class v4 not measured · 2026-10-07 | 138.4 | 0.52 | 266.3 W | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read)Class v4 cost not measured (class v4 program only)Tuned stock, bench only (rented, not tuned)Generator v2 · Miner hive package 0.3.20 igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (NVIDIA driver 580, Ubuntu 24.04)Source bench log: 7 October 2026, every rentable card on the hash (the fleet's sweep on rented cards; hive package 0.3.20, Ubuntu 24.04) · Who measured by the fleet | |||||
| NVIDIA A100 SXM4 (80 GB)class v4 not measured · 2026-10-08 | 138.1 | 0.515 | 268.6 W | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (rented card, no clock control on the host; no measured tune point)Class v4 cost not measured (class v4 program only)Tuned stock, bench only (rented, no clock control on the host)Generator v2 · Miner bench pack, igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (3 x 300 dispatches of 2^22) (NVIDIA driver 595.71.05, Ubuntu 24.04 (CUDA 12.8.1 image))Source model sweep 2026-10-08, row 13 (a rented card, result cb2-a100-80-gb-j79g-result.json; 09:43Z) · Who measured by the fleetNote rented single-card host, 0.04 h; power.draw mean 268.6 W (max 274.1, limit 400 W; no power average on this host), SM 1,410 MHz, HBM2e 1,593 MHz, 44 C, no throttle reason; self-test PASS (96 of 96 vector lanes); the class v5 kit reads 136.48 MH/s, 1.3 percent under class v4 (fingerprint matched), the first card where v5 is not level with v4; read ceiling 138.6 MH/s, the hash at 1.00 of it. Repeats the three 7 October readings (138.39, 138.74, 138.76) to 0.3 percent on a fourth host; datacentre-class per watt, a third of a 3080 Ti's MH per rented dollar | |||||
| NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell (96 GB)class v4 not measured · 2026-10-07 | 130.5 | 0.452 | 288.7 W | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read)Class v4 cost not measured (class v4 program only)Tuned stock, bench only (rented, not tuned)Generator v2 · Miner hive package 0.3.20 igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (NVIDIA driver 580, Ubuntu 24.04)Source bench log: 7 October 2026, every rentable card on the hash (the fleet's sweep on rented cards; hive package 0.3.20, Ubuntu 24.04) · Who measured by the fleet | |||||
| NVIDIA L40S (48 GB)class v4 not measured · 2026-10-08 | 56.4 | 0.256 | 220.7 W | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (rented card, no clock control on the host; no measured tune point)Class v4 cost not measured (class v4 program only)Tuned stock, bench only (rented, no clock control on the host)Generator v2 · Miner bench pack, igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (3 x 300 dispatches of 2^22) (NVIDIA driver 570.133.20, Ubuntu 24.04 (CUDA 12.8.1 image))Source model sweep 2026-10-08, row 21 (a rented card, result cb2-l40s-48-gb-0890-result.json; 09:57Z) · Who measured by the fleetNote rented single-card host, 0.17 h; power.draw mean 220.7 W (max 227.2, limit 350 W), SM 2,520 MHz, memory 9,001 MHz, 45 C, no throttle reason; self-test PASS (96 of 96 vector lanes); the class v5 kit holds the rate (56.51 MH/s, fingerprint matched); read ceiling 57.8 MH/s, the hash at 0.98 of it. Repeats the 7 October row (56.36 then, 56.41 now) at 20 W less on this host; a 384-bit GDDR6 card that lands where the 3090 Ti and the A6000 do at a datacentre price. Driver 570.133, the oldest of the sweep, ran the CUDA 12.8 worker clean: 570 is a safe floor | |||||
| NVIDIA L40S (48 GB)class v4 not measured · 2026-10-07 | 56.4 | 0.234 | 240.7 W | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read)Class v4 cost not measured (class v4 program only)Tuned stock, bench only (rented, not tuned)Generator v2 · Miner hive package 0.3.20 igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (NVIDIA driver 580, Ubuntu 24.04)Source bench log: 7 October 2026, every rentable card on the hash (the fleet's sweep on rented cards; hive package 0.3.20, Ubuntu 24.04) · Who measured by the fleet | |||||
| NVIDIA RTX A6000 (48 GB)class v4 not measured · 2026-10-08 | 53.6 | 0.224 | 239.1 W | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (rented card, no clock control on the host; no measured tune point)Class v4 cost not measured (class v4 program only)Tuned stock, bench only (rented, no clock control on the host)Generator v2 · Miner bench pack, igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (3 x 300 dispatches of 2^22) (NVIDIA driver 595.84, Ubuntu 24.04 (CUDA 12.8.1 image))Source model sweep 2026-10-08, row 16 (a rented card, result cb2-rtx-a6000-48-gb-9600-result.json; 09:46Z) · Who measured by the fleetNote rented single-card host, 0.15 h; power.draw mean 239.1 W (max 251.0, limit 300 W), SM 1,913 MHz mean, memory 7,601 MHz, 65 C, no throttle reason; self-test PASS (96 of 96 vector lanes); the class v5 kit holds the rate (53.82 MH/s, fingerprint matched), so on an uncapped sm_86 card v5 is level with v4 and the A4000's v5 reading narrows to its power cap; read ceiling 53.8 MH/s, the hash at 1.00 of it. Repeats the 7 October row (53.66 then, 53.64 now) at 43 W less on this host; a 3090-class rate at a 3090-class draw | |||||
| NVIDIA RTX A5000 (24 GB)class v4 not measured · 2026-10-07 | 47.6 | not measured | not read | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read)Class v4 cost not measured (class v4 program only)Tuned stock, miningGenerator v2 · Miner hive package 0.3.20 igneum-miner, class v4 program (NVIDIA driver, Ubuntu 24.04)Source the fleet's standing voter (status line, 7 October 2026) · Who reported by the fleetNote a standing voter's status line, 18:00Z; watts not read | |||||
| NVIDIA RTX A4000 (16 GB)class v4 not measured · 2026-10-08 | 31.4 | 0.279 | 112.8 W | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (rented card, no clock control on the host; no measured tune point)Class v4 cost not measured (class v4 program only)Tuned stock, bench only (rented, no clock control on the host)Generator v2 · Miner bench pack, igneum-worker-cuda, class v4 program (3 x 300 dispatches of 2^22) (NVIDIA driver 595.91.07, Ubuntu 24.04 (CUDA 12.8.1 image))Source model sweep 2026-10-08, row 15 (a rented card, result cb2-rtx-a4000-16-gb-9473-result.json; 09:45Z) · Who measured by the fleetNote rented single-card host, 0.16 h; power.draw mean 112.8 W on a host that caps the card at 114 W (stock 140 W; the SW power-cap bit set the whole run), SM 1,562 MHz mean, memory 6,501 MHz, 81 C; self-test PASS (96 of 96 vector lanes); read ceiling 31.6 MH/s, the hash at 0.99 of it. Class v4 repeats the 7 October row (31.45 then, 31.41 now) under the cap. The class v5 kit's reading on this capped host is held off the page until an uncapped A4000 confirms it | |||||
Earlier classes (6 rows: the genesis program, the hourly program, class v3 before the shadow; not comparable with the table above)
The bench numbers of 3 and 4 October 2026. A higher MH/s here is a different hash, not a faster card.
| NVIDIA RTX 5090 (32 GB)class v4 not measured · 2026-10-03 | 229 | not measured | not read | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read)Class v4 cost not measuredTuned stock, bench onlyGenerator v1 · Miner proto-cuda bench (prototype, not mining)Source bench log: 3 October 2026, RTX 5090, memory-hard dataset (pack igneum-genesis-mh) · Who measured by the teamNote genesis program, 104 loads per hash, 1 GiB dataset | |||||
| NVIDIA RTX 5090 (32 GB)class v4 not measured · 2026-10-03 | 185.3 | not measured | not read | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read)Class v4 cost not measuredTuned stock, bench onlyGenerator v1 · Miner proto-cuda bench (prototype, not mining)Source bench log: 3 October 2026, RTX 5090 first run, dataset sweep and second program · Who measured by the teamNote hourly program, 128 loads per hash, 1 GiB dataset | |||||
| NVIDIA RTX 5090 (32 GB)class v4 not measured · 2026-10-04 | 124.2 | not measured | not read | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read)Class v4 cost not measuredTuned stock, miningGenerator v2 · Miner Igneum Miner 0.3.0 package, prebuilt NVRTC workerSource bench log: 4 October 2026, the gfx1036 worker fault and what the Apple M5 Max could and could not reproduce · Who measured by the teamNote live devnet v4, 128 loads per hash, CPU re-check clean, 0 rejected | |||||
| Apple M5 Max (40 GPU cores, Metal)class v4 not measured · 2026-10-03 | 45.2 | not measured | not read | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read)Class v4 cost not measuredTuned stock, bench onlyGenerator v1 · Miner proto-metal bench (prototype, not mining)Source bench log: 3 October 2026, RTX 5090 first run (the Apple row of the same table) · Who measured by the teamNote genesis program, 1 GiB dataset | |||||
| Apple M5 Max (40 GPU cores, Metal)class v4 not measured · 2026-10-04 | 26.7 | not measured | not read | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read)Class v4 cost not measuredTuned stock, miningGenerator v2 · Miner igneum-miner devnet v4, Metal worker with prepareSource bench log: 4 October 2026, first hourly program swap on the live devnet: compile-ahead, no pause, two cards · Who measured by the teamNote live devnet v4, unbroken through the hour boundary | |||||
| Apple silicon laptop (model not reported)class v4 not measured · 2026-10-04 | 24.3 | not measured | not read | Stock | |
| Hive flight sheet stock (no measured tune point; the 5080 and 9070 XT passes and the class v4 efficiency pass land theirs when read)Class v4 cost not measuredTuned stock, miningGenerator v2 · Miner Igneum Miner 0.3.1 (DMG)Source bench log: 4 October 2026, first outside machine on the devnet: an Apple silicon laptop through the Igneum Miner app · Who reported by the fleetNote 21.0 MH/s average over 7 minutes, 24.3 MH/s at the moment of the report, 33 accepted blocks | |||||
Why the rates changed
The genesis program did 104 dependent random 4-byte loads per hash over a 1 GiB dataset; the hourly program and class v3 do 128, with the mixer between them; class v4 adds about 100,000 integer operations per hash that ride in the memory wait. So the hash is bound by random-read bandwidth by design, and a card's MH/s is a relative number: the difficulty follows it, and the same card earns the same share of blocks at 136 MH/s on class v3 as it did at 228 MH/s on the genesis program. What a miner compares is hash per watt, and what the chain cares about is the chip edge, which the shadow work is there to cut.
How a row gets here
Every row names the engineering log entry or the job it came from. "Measured by the team" means our own hardware and our own log. "Reported by the fleet" or "measured by the fleet" means a machine we rent or do not own, read from the status lines its miner uploads or from a bench run on it.
MH per watt needs the card's power draw during the run. The app reads it on NVIDIA cards through the driver. Rows get the figure when a run records it. The class v4 cost column is what the latency-shadow work costs that card against the class v3 control, in watts and rate, where it was measured. The tuned column is the card's state at the row: a full Ember Tune names its point; stock means the card as it came, bench only or mining.
There is no other Igneum miner to compare with yet, so this table compares cards, not miners. The app that produces these rows: the miner page.
Fleet tuning priors
Ember Tune runs on every card the app mines with: the power limit and the core clock are stepped on the live program and the card keeps the point with the best MH per watt within 1% of its top rate. Every finished tune is reported back without anything that identifies the owner, and the fleet's median point per card model, driver major and program class comes back down inside the signed update manifest as the starting point for the next card of that model. A model needs 5 reports before its prior is used.
No tune reports yet. The first rows appear once five machines with the same card model have reported.
Measured by the team
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 (driver 617, class l128w0, 2026-10-06, job
ember-tune-pc1-6): 1854 MHz core cap, power limit 100% (575 W). 84 W saved for 0.15% of rate: 127.71 MH/s at 226.8 W (0.563 MH/W) against 127.9 MH/s at 311 W untuned (0.411 MH/W), 37% more hashes per watt. The chosen clock is the ladder's floor (60% of the maximum), not the optimum; the next cut's ladder goes to 45% and the climb walks on from here. - NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 (driver 617, class l128w0, 2026-10-06, job
ember-tune-pc1-6): 1863 MHz core cap, power limit 50% (100 W). 30 W saved for no rate lost: 28.78 MH/s at 75.6 W (0.381 MH/W) against 28.72 MH/s at 106 W untuned (0.271 MH/W), 41% more hashes per watt. The chosen clock is the ladder's floor (60% of the maximum), not the optimum; the next cut's ladder goes to 45%.
Rows: 0. Written from the fleet's tune records at build time.